College Football Geek Forum

Horseman - 25 July 2009 06:32 AM

Just my hummble opinion…Grizz deserves an A+ on RBs….Dawg needs at least a C- or D+ on his RBs to prevent mob violence in the Geek Forum..rolling the dice is one thing ..playing Russian roulette is another

This coming from the man who drafted Anthony Dixon just DAYS after his DUI arrest. I think that draft pick eliminated your credibility in grading RBs. And while I’m on the subject, you lost your credibility on grading WRs from you Mike Williams selection!!!

Your Honor,
      OJ was acquitted and the King of Pop settled out of court..no vigillante justice if you please..also .check Saint Michael’s 07 stats ...+ he’s not coming back from a nasty injury like Todd’s Jeremy Williams ...it was a classroom issue that kept the Big East best WR out{*Tim Brown could be the best the East]..as far as your RBs go…just remember the rabbit u had to pull the out the hat to win the Championship last year….keep the same RB mind set and you’ll be washing the Horseman’s feet AGAIN this year…Judge “If the glove don’t fit you must acquit”...Big Dix will beat the rap..there is no evidence…also we’re talking Starkville here.. not Cambridge

P.S…..nice pic Cool..looks like already preparing your self for the Sept 5th beat down..bring plenty of body bags to the game

Dan..KUDOS…real nice draft..nice mix

Hey Horseman, I was crucified for taking Tim Brown and Mike Williams in the late rounds of a BCS-only mock last month. 
http://www.collegefootballgeek.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/54/

Considering this mock is an All-FBS format with twice as much selection, you’re getting off easy here on the criticism front.

I welcome criticism….all except the cainine variety…he must have been home schooled

Thanks for everything. I really enjoyed this and it is awesome that I didn’t have the lowest GPA.

come on Todd:
Hey Horseman, I was crucified for taking Tim Brown and Mike Williams in the late rounds of a BCS-only mock last month ....

don’t get over dramatic.  I only threatened to murder you by pushing you off a cliff; for the obvious crime of HOLLYWOODING the VALUE of “the big East’s best WR” ... and his cousin Tim Brown).

Crucified is way too strong, next time just say “almost murdered” ... it’s just closer to the truth!

Juice Williams was the 55th BCS player off the board while Todd Reesing was the 3rd BCS player off the board.  I like Reesing as a second round pick (BCS only) and see Juice as a tad better option than Reesing.

Hey bbaver, I agree that Reesing went way too early.  We have him ranked as the No. 12 QB (all-FBS) and Juice at No. 16.

I’d take Reesing over Juice.  His schedule is just too “juicy”, pardon the pun (#115 Pass SOS, or 6th easiest).  Juice’s Pass SOS is middle of the road at #58.  Also, as many on this board will tell you, Juice is unpredictable.  Start him against Western Michigan and he struggles.  Bench him against Ohio State and he explodes.  He’s just one of those tough to read guys.  Still a top 20 QB, but he comes with those string attached.

Agree Todd, in that Juice is more risky than Reesing.  But, with our scoring system (.05 per passing yard, .10 per rushing yard, 3 pts per TD pass, 5 pts per rushing TD), I believe Juice actually outscored Tim Tebow in terms of points per game last year.  (Tebow played 14 games vs. Juice’s 12).

bbaver - 28 July 2009 02:50 PM

Agree Todd, in that Juice is more risky than Reesing.  But, with our scoring system (.05 per passing yard, .10 per rushing yard, 3 pts per TD pass, 5 pts per rushing TD), I believe Juice actually outscored Tim Tebow in terms of points per game last year.  (Tebow played 14 games vs. Juice’s 12).

You’ll sleep better at night with Reesing

In either type of league:  Reesing is worth a mid second round pick (exactly where is avg. is saying he is going)  starting in R3 - he’s a value pick (and poss. 1 of the most valuable value picks in the nation).  He’s JUST UNDER the elite level QB’s that would of been drafted 10-20 positions higher, in exchange for a top 6 RB or DEZ BRYANT.